Looking for a QLC+ alternative on Mac?

QLC+ is free, open-source lighting control from Massimo Callegari and contributors, and it runs on Windows, macOS and Linux. HitLight is a macOS-only alternative that programs scenes from plain English and can run a rig live from the music in the room. Here is the honest comparison, starting with what QLC+ does better.

Who is QLC+ right for?

QLC+ is right for hobbyists and technical users willing to learn a console-shaped interface. It is genuinely free, genuinely capable, and it runs on Windows, macOS and Linux — so it costs nothing to try and it does not care which laptop you own. If you are comfortable learning a console-shaped interface, QLC+ may be all you ever need, and plenty of working rigs run on nothing else.

QLC+ is also open source, which is a durable advantage rather than a talking point. The source code is public, an open-source licence does not expire, and no vendor can decide to stop selling it to you. For a school, a community theatre or a rehearsal room that needs the same rig to still work in five years, that outlasts any individual feature.

The project publishes its own downloads, documentation and forum at qlcplus.org. Read theirs alongside this page. This one is written by the people who make HitLight, and you should weigh it accordingly.

What does QLC+ do that HitLight does not?

QLC+ runs on operating systems HitLight does not support at all. QLC+ is available for Windows, macOS and Linux, while HitLight's DMX output runs only in the macOS app and requires macOS 14 or later. QLC+ is also an established project with years of released versions and an active community behind it. HitLight is public beta software.

The macOS version floor is the constraint people hit first. HitLight needs macOS 14+ to drive lights, which rules out an older Mac that is otherwise perfectly good at running a lighting rig. QLC+ publishes its own system requirements, and they are not ours to summarise — check them on the project's site before assuming either tool will run on the machine you already have.

QLC+ also does not require an internet connection for its core features. HitLight requires internet access for account sync, collaboration and AI features; offline recovery is being tested during the beta and is not yet promised. If you work in a basement venue with no usable network, that single difference decides the question.

QLC+ and HitLight on the points that disqualify one of them outright. Last verified 2026-08-01.
QuestionQLC+HitLight
Which operating systems?Windows, macOS and Linux. Check the project's own downloads page for current builds.macOS 14 or later for hardware output. There is no Windows build and no Linux build.
What does it cost?Free and open sourceFree during the public beta, with no credit card. Launch pricing has not been announced.
How finished is it?An established project with years of released versions and an active community.Public beta. Features, quotas, file formats and availability may change, and it ships without an uptime guarantee.
Does it need internet?Its core features do not require an internet connection.Internet is required for account sync, collaboration and AI features. Offline recovery is being tested during the beta.
Who maintains it?Massimo Callegari and contributors, with the source code public.A small team in Oslo, Norway. The app is closed source.

There is one more thing QLC+ has that no new product can buy: years of forum threads written by people who already hit your problem. On a bad night that is worth more than a feature list.

What does HitLight do differently?

HitLight programs lighting from a description rather than from channel numbers, and it can run a rig live with no scenes programmed in advance. Turn on Auto Show and HitLight listens to the room through the Mac's system-default microphone, follows the beat and the structure of what is playing, and drives colour, intensity and eligible movement while you do something else.

There is no track pre-analysis and no DJ-software integration, which is a limitation in some rooms and the entire point in others: a microphone does not care whether the music is recorded, unreleased or being played live in front of it.

If the console-shaped way of working is what you like about QLC+, HitLight has that too: a matrix scene editor, cue lists with GO and BACK, a multi-track timeline, a virtual console you arrange yourself, MIDI learn including a footswitch, and palettes that update every scene using them. The assistant is a way to start a scene, not a requirement.

Should you pick QLC+ or HitLight?

Pick QLC+ if you need a platform HitLight does not run on, software that works offline, or a finished product with a community around it. Pick HitLight if you are on a recent Mac and would rather describe a look than build it channel by channel. These lists are written to be used, not to be won.

Pick QLC+ if

Pick HitLight if

If neither list is obviously yours, install both. QLC+ costs nothing, HitLight is free during the public beta, and an evening with each will settle it faster than any comparison page written by a vendor.

Last verified .

Try it on your own rig

Patch your fixtures, describe the look you want, and watch it on the 3D stage before you connect anything.

Free during the public beta, with no credit card. Launch pricing has not been announced. Requires macOS 14 or later for hardware output.